World Dominance

Third World War Started Like This

The Third World War ignited 30-40 years ago, fueled by Putin’s quest for global dominance. In 1987, it was reported that Trump was recruited by the KGB, taking on the alias Krasnov, according to FBI documents.

Now, Ukraine and other Western democracies stand as primary targets of Putin’s aggression. At first, Orban (EU member Hungary) was a pawn in Putin’s game, attempting to sway Ukraine, but his efforts fell short compared to his hidden violent maneuvers in Hungary. While Hungary saw minor violence, it pales in comparison to the devastation unfolding in Ukraine. Countries like Belarus and Tajikistan have already suffered under Putin's shadow, and his sights are now set on Georgia, Moldova, and Romania, among others.

Additionally, nations such as Germany, France, and Italy have been found to harbor right-wing Putin-allies whom Trump, Vance, and Musk are trying to influence. Putin’s ongoing assault on Ukraine lays bare a grim reality of our times, and Trump’s disturbing alliance with him only deepens the crisis. Biden had the right strategy, which the Trump team is now destroying, helping Putin continue his wars against Europe, especially.

The Third World War was partly fueled by Trump’s support for Putin’s agenda. While manipulating U.S. politics may have been relatively straightforward for Putin, Europe presents a formidable challenge.

Even if Trump, Musk, and Vance attempt to transpose their American election strategies onto Europe, they will find it impossible to sway the European populace. Europeans are characterized by their independent thinking and robust education; they have lived through the horrors of regimes like the Nazis and will not yield to Putin’s very similar threats, including the specter of atomic warfare. They will also fiercely resist any notion that Musk and pro-Russian oligarchs can escape to Mars in the aftermath of a potential nuclear conflict. The Third World War is now unfolding because Trump is aiding Putin in his efforts to recover from Biden’s strong politics.

Putin grossly underestimates the resilience of Western democracies; he perceives them as fragile, yet the truth is far different. His outdated Nazi-strategy from the Second World War is not a show of strength but a testament to his profound weakness.

Thanks to Trump, the US will be isolated from all profound democracies. Trump is withdrawing from NATO and the UN to give himself and Putin free hands to attack NATO allies. The American people will for sure suffer a lot, and the US will be internationally weakened. Russia will not attack the US - it is already controlled and being robbed/weakened by the pro-Russian Republicans. The US is already finished as an independent democracy.

Vladimir Putin has been fixated on Ukraine since the Orange Revolution, which began on November 22, 2004, when protests erupted over a rigged presidential election in Kyiv. Few anticipated that this would lead to the most significant conflict in Europe since World War II. Putin aimed to undermine Ukraine, seeing it as a challenge to authoritarian rule.

While the revolution brought Viktor Yushchenko to power in Ukraine, it failed to bring about the political change many Ukrainians had hoped for. Yushchenko's presidency was marked by infighting, and he lost the 2010 election to Viktor Yanukovych, who had played a role in the Orange Revolution.

Despite its shortcomings, the revolution underscored the growing divide between Ukraine and Russia. Russia under Putin centralized power, while Ukraine exhibited a more fragmented political landscape. Vladimir Putin supported Viktor Yanukovych in the 2004 presidential election. After Yanukovych won, Putin called for a crackdown on protesters, highlighting the increasing rift between Ukraine and Russia.

Since then, Ukraine has steadily distanced itself from Russia. Putin played a crucial personal role in the Orange Revolution. Russian television, which many people in Ukraine watched then, heavily supported Viktor Yanukovych's candidacy before the Ukrainian presidential election.

On the eve of the vote, Putin made the critical decision to intervene directly. In late October 2004, he traveled to Kyiv, where he was greeted with a military parade. Then, he went on national TV to lecture the Ukrainian public about why they should support his preferred presidential pick.

It soon became apparent that Putin had miscalculated. His open and unapologetic attempt to interfere in Ukraine's internal affairs was widely interpreted as a grave insult and an indication of his contempt for Ukrainian statehood. This angered the public and helped mobilize millions of Ukrainians to participate in politics.

Weeks later, after a flawed second round of voting, Ukrainians came to Kyiv in large numbers to protest the election results. Putin's actions were one of the leading causes of the Orange Revolution. Putin's attempts to assert control over Ukraine over the past twenty years have consistently backfired, driving the two countries apart.

In 2013, he pressured his ally Yanukovych to renounce European integration, leading to a second revolution and Yanukovych's downfall. In February 2014, Putin initiated military action by seizing Crimea and later sending troops to Ukraine's Donbas region. When this intervention reinforced Ukraine's desire for independence, he began planning the full-scale invasion of February 2022.

Since the Orange Revolution, Putin's ambition to reclaim Ukraine has defined his rule. He has sacrificed countless Russian soldiers, Russia's economic stability, international standing, and relations with the developed world in pursuit of this goal.

This shift in Putin's worldview became apparent after the revolution when he launched RT, establishing Russia as a major player in anti-Western disinformation. In 2005, the Kremlin encouraged Russians to wear orange and black St George's ribbons to honor Soviet victories, a direct response to Ukrainian symbolism that has since fueled a cult of World War II veneration, emblematic of the Putin era.

Putin's obsession with Ukraine stems from his imperialist view of Russian identity and his experiences as a KGB officer during the Soviet collapse. In 1989, Putin was in East Germany when the Berlin Wall fell, witnessing the collapse of Soviet control amid pro-democracy protests.

He claims his superiors told him, "Moscow is silent," a lesson that haunts him today as he perceives any loss of influence as a threat to Russia. Putin is particularly sensitive to Ukraine's national awakening and its embrace of European democracy, viewing Ukraine as a crucial part of Russia's identity. His opposition to Ukrainian independence began after the 2004 Orange Revolution, and he has consistently called the USSR's fall the "greatest political catastrophe of the twentieth century."

Currently, the ongoing Russian invasion stems from Putin's belief that losing Ukraine poses an existential threat to Russia. Any compromise with the Kremlin is futile; peace will only be achievable if it is made clear that Ukrainian independence is irreversible.

Imposing neutrality on Ukraine will not stop Putin or bring lasting peace to Europe. In the wake of Donald Trump's election, speculation about a negotiated settlement in the Russian-Ukrainian war has resurfaced. Putin has reiterated his demand for Ukraine's neutrality, insisting that good relations between Russia and Ukraine are difficult to envision without it.

This demand has been consistent since the full-scale invasion and was a key point during early peace talks. Some in the international community view this demand as reasonable, arguing that NATO's expansion has provoked conflict. They believe a neutral Ukraine could appease Russia. However, reports suggest a potential freeze on Ukraine's NATO aspirations might be considered part of a peace deal.

Such a move would be a grave mistake, as it would leave Ukraine vulnerable to further Russian aggression. Ukrainians have already learned that neutrality does not shield them from Russian aggression. Despite adopting a non-aligned status during Viktor Yanukovych's presidency, Russia attempted to exert control over Ukraine, ultimately using military force when faced with resistance.

Since the 2014 invasion, Putin has cited Ukraine's potential NATO membership as a rationale for aggression despite Ukraine showing little progress toward joining the alliance. NATO has only spoken vaguely about Ukraine's future membership, knowing this to be an exaggerated threat used by Putin to justify his actions. No members of NATO have spoken in favor of Ukraine's membership. Not before now!

Notably, when Finland and Sweden sought NATO membership after Russia's invasion, Putin showed indifference despite the strategic implications for Russia. His troop withdrawals from the Finnish border suggest he does not view NATO as a genuine threat. It was a big lie to justify his war. He even claimed that NATO was going to attack the Kremlin to justify his war to the Russians.

Putin's genuine concern lies in NATO's ability to deter Russian bullying of its neighbors. This reveals that his opposition to Ukraine's NATO aspirations is driven by the desire to undermine Ukrainian sovereignty rather than security concerns. For years, Putin has made no secret of his belief that the emergence of an independent Ukraine is a historical mistake and a symbol of modern Russia's retreat from empire.

He has repeatedly claimed that Ukraine is not a "real country" and is fond of declaring that Ukrainians are Russians ("one people"). In July 2021, Putin even published an entire essay arguing against the legitimacy of an independent Ukrainian state. The same strategy that Trump is now using against the NATO allies.

Since the start of the full-scale invasion, it has become increasingly clear that Putin's ultimate goal is not Ukraine's neutrality but its destruction. The Kremlin's propaganda machine has portrayed Ukraine as intolerably "anti-Russian" and promoted the idea that Ukraine's continued existence is incompatible with Russia's security. But Ukraine's people are independent-minded democrats, as are people in every other European country.

Meanwhile, Putin has compared his invasion to the imperial conquests of 18th-century Russian ruler Peter the Great and has repeatedly claimed that he is "returning" historically Russian lands. Putin's imperialist outbursts must be taken seriously.

Throughout occupied Ukraine, his soldiers and administrators are already imposing a reign of terror that directly echoes the criminal logic of his imperial fantasies. Millions have been displaced, and thousands more have disappeared into a vast network of camps and prisons. Those who remain face a policy of relentless Russification and suppression of all things Ukrainian.

Adults must accept Russian citizenship to access essential services, while children are forced to undergo indoctrination in schools that teach a new Kremlin curriculum. The crimes currently taking place in Russian-occupied Ukraine are a clear indication of what awaits the rest of the country if Trump and Putin succeed.

Despite several military setbacks, he remains fully committed to his maximalist goals of ending Ukrainian independence and erasing Ukrainian identity. Furthermore, since 2022, Putin has demonstrated that he is willing to wait as long as it takes to overcome Ukrainian resistance and is willing to pay almost any price to achieve his imperial ambitions, including atomic bombs.

Imposing neutrality on Ukraine under these circumstances would be tantamount to condemning the country to a slow but sure death. Any peace process that does not provide Ukraine with credible long-term security guarantees is doomed to failure.

Giving in to Putin's demands for a neutral Ukraine may offer some short-term relief from the threat of an expansionist Russia. Still, it would ultimately lead to more war and the likely collapse of the current global security order. There is simply no plausible argument for insisting on Ukrainian neutrality other than the desire to leave the country defenseless and at Russia's mercy.

Peace will only come when Putin is finally compelled to recognize Ukraine's right to exist as an independent country and a member of the international community. This includes, of course, the right to choose security alliances. It is absurd to prioritize Russia's disingenuous security concerns over Ukraine's very real fears of national annihilation.

Instead, when serious negotiations begin in the coming months, Ukraine's security must be the top priority. Until Ukraine is secure, Europe will remain insecure, and the threat of Russian imperialism will continue to loom over the continent.

Peace will only be achievable when Putin recognizes Ukraine's sovereign right to exist as an independent nation and embraces its rightful place in the democratic world, including its choice of security alliances.

It is entirely unreasonable to place Russia's fabricated security concerns above Ukraine's genuine and pressing fears for its survival. In any negotiations, Ukraine's security must take center stage. As long as Ukraine feels threatened, Europe will remain vulnerable, and the specter of Russian imperialism will persist.

Putin has broken all peace agreements with Ukraine since 1994, so no one believes this time will be the last time he attacks Ukraine again. This time, he gets all the help he can wish for from Trump. Now is the time to support Ukraine more than ever. There is undeniable evidence that Putin is actively positioning himself for significant conflicts.

Meanwhile, Trump is facilitating this agenda at an alarming pace, particularly by stirring tensions with European democracies. Never before have two leaders, Trump and Putin, shown such urgency to instigate wars.

Trump's actions unequivocally serve Putin's interests, leaving no doubt about his complicity in this dangerous game. Even if Putin had been the president of the US himself, he could not have destroyed the US and the Western democracies more or faster than Trump has done in 3 months.

And it will get worse until the US is totally weakened and has lost all influence and friends worldwide. As long as the pro-Russian Republicans help Russia, only Europe can save us.

And remember, Europe has always supported the US before, and will do it again when the democrats regain power. But they can not support pro-Russians as the situation is now. Maybe it seems like it, but it is not the politicians who have the power, when direct democracy and boycotting are evolving worldwide.

Please boycott the pro-Russian and Russian oligarchs' companies now!